Comparison · read 18 October 2026

GridCraft vs Excel

The headline number says GridCraft has 98% of Excel's functions. The project's own estimate says it is half a spreadsheet. Both figures are honest, and the distance between them is where this comparison lives.

Short answer

Excel is not under threat from GridCraft and will not be this year. What GridCraft offers is a fast native engine with a complete function library, an open format path, and an MCP server — a spreadsheet an agent can compute in. If your workbook is inherited, stay where it is.

Side by side

 GridCraftExcel
Maturityalpha — self-rated ~50%Four decades of production use
Functions513 of 523 implemented; 504 verifiedThe reference implementation
Native format.xlsx read/write; XLSB and ODS import.xlsx, .xlsb, .xls, legacy variants
PivotTablesNot yetCore, heavily used
Get & Transform / Power QueryAbsentMature
Very large workbooksListed as outstanding workOptimised, with a documented model size limit
RecalculationDependency graph, dynamic arrays, single-threaded recalc for nowMulti-threaded, decades of edge cases
CollaborationNoneReal-time co-authoring
AutomationMCP server, CLI, JSON control channelVBA, Office Scripts, add-ins, Power Automate
PlatformsWindows, macOS, Linux, BSD, webWindows, macOS, web
PriceFree, MIT or Apache-2.0Subscription

Where GridCraft wins

It exists on Linux. Excel does not. For a Linux workstation, a native spreadsheet with Excel-compatible formulas and .xlsx output is a real gap filled.

The engine is separable. The formula engine, the model and the UI are distinct crates with enforced layering. You can drive a workbook from a script or an agent without opening a window — which is how SELENE-scale automation becomes possible in a spreadsheet context.

No licence, no telemetry, no account. For a company that cannot put a file in a cloud tenant, that changes what is possible.

Speed. A Rust binary recalculating a mid-sized model feels different from a suite loading its add-ins.

Where Excel wins, and it is not close

PivotTables. Listed as pending. Most business spreadsheets are not formula grids — they are pivots on top of a data model, refreshed weekly, emailed to a committee.

Power Query. Absent. The whole modern Excel workflow of pulling, cleaning and reshaping data is not in GridCraft today.

Recalculation fidelity at scale. GridCraft's roadmap cites large workbooks and multi-threaded recalc as outstanding. A spreadsheet that is slow, or worse, quietly different, is a spreadsheet you cannot trust with a number that matters.

The files you inherit. .xlsx round-trip on real-world files is the project's own top-ranked remaining cost.

The test that settles it in five minutes

Open a workbook you know the answer to — not a trivial one, something with lookups, dates and a nested IF. Force a full recalc in GridCraft. Compare the totals against Excel. If they match to the cent, you have a tool. If they do not, you have a promising alpha.

Do that test before you convert anything you depend on, and keep the original file until it passes twice.

Frequently asked

Does GridCraft support PivotTables?

Not yet — they are named in the roadmap as pending, alongside Get & Transform, the data model and collaboration.

How many Excel functions does GridCraft have?

513 of 523 implemented, with 504 verified as computing correctly (96.4%), measured in the project's own function-parity document.

Is GridCraft a replacement for Excel?

For spreadsheets you author yourself, plausibly. For inherited workbooks, no: the project scores itself about 50% ready and ranks real-world file fidelity as its largest remaining cost.

Sources: GridCraft repository (README, ROADMAP.md, docs/function-parity.md, docs/gaps.md); Microsoft Excel documentation. Read 18 October 2026.